RAGHVENDRA SINGH KSHATRIYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPS/3033/2026 · 2026-04-06
Shri Parth Prateem Sahu
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4027 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4027 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 3
2026:CGHC:15750
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3033 of 2026 Raghvendra Singh Kshatriya S/o Late Shri Ramakant Kshatriya Aged About 63 Years Retired As Branch Manager, Bandar Grih Nigam, Charama, R/o Adarsh Nagar Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Supplies And Consumer Protection Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Managing Director (Personnel/accounts/technical/business) Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Raipur, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The General Manager Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Raipur, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Regional Manager Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Charama/kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5 - The Branch Manager Accounts / Pay Office, Chhattisgarh State Ware Housing Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) 6 - The Accountant General Zero Point, Vidhan Sabha Road, Balouda Bazar Road, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.04.08 10:47:09 +0530
2 / 3
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Baldau Prasad Banjare, Advocate For State/Respondent no. 1 : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent no. 2 to 5 : Mr. Anumesh Shrivastava, Advocate appears through Video Conferencing, assisted by Mr. Syed Zaid Ziya Ali, Advocate For Respondent no. 6 : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board 07.04.2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- ‘10.1This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 This Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents no. 2 and 3 to give pensions towards the petitioner from the date of suspension to superannuation because the petitioner has served more than 10 years of services and total served more than 19 years. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the pending representation (Annexure P-8) which is still pending before the competent authorities 10.4 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s)/writ(s), order(s) in favour of the petitioner which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit &
3 / 3 just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.”
2.
Learned Counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction to respondent no. 2 to 5 to consider and take decision on representation submitted by petitioner at the earliest within specified time frame.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 to 5 submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection.
4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage, permitting petitioner to submit fresh comprehensive representation along with all supporting documents before concerned authority and if such representation is submitted concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the same, in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a further period of ‘three months’ from the date of receipt of representation. It is ordered accordingly. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza