- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304762026 NC: 2026:KHC:49645 WP NO.14330 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 14330 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SUNDRAMMA D/O LATE BASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT MUKKADHALLI VILLAGE, HARAVE HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR – 571 128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGENDRA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU – 560 001. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. TAHSILDAR CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR – 571 128. 3. SMT. RAJAMMA W/O LATE PUTTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT MUKKADAHALLI VILLAGE, HARAVE HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR – 571 128. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304762026 NC: 2026:KHC:49645 WP NO.14330 OF 2026 4. SMT. PUTTATHAYAMMA @ THYAMMA W/O SHIVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, R/AT THAGADURU VILLAGE, NANJANAGUDU TALUK, MYSURU – 571 119. 5. MAHADEVA S/O RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 6. GOWRAMMA D/O RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 7. MANJULA D/O RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 8. SAVITHA D/O RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 9. ANITHA D/O RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 5 TO 9 ARE R/AT KEREHALLI VILLAGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR – 571 128. 10. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 11. MAHENDRA C. S/O LATE CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304762026 NC: 2026:KHC:49645 WP NO.14330 OF 2026 RESPONDENTS 10 AND 11 ARE R/AT NO.352, HUNASURU MAIN ROAD, NEAR HINAKAL BUS STOP, HINAKAL, MYSURU – 570 017. 12. RANJITHA C. D/O LATE CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.10181, 2ND STAGE, 4TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGARA, MYSURU – 570 017. 13. MANJULA D/O LATE BASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT MUKKADHALLI VILLAGE, HARAVE HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR – 571 128. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE MUTATION ORDERS DATED 31ST DECEMBER, 2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-Q WITH RESPECT TO LAND BEARING SURVEY NO.47 TO AN EXTENT OF 4 ACRE 33 GUNATS SITUATED AT MUKKADAHALLI VILLAGE, HARAVE HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304762026 NC: 2026:KHC:49645 WP NO.14330 OF 2026 ORAL ORDER Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the Mutation order passed by the respondent No.2 in respect of the subject land. 3. Heard Sri. Nagendra M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2. 4. Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2 submits that, if the petitioner is being aggrieved by the mutation order passed by the respondent No.2 in respect of the subject land, she is having a remedy to challenge the same before the competent authority under the provisions of Karnataka Land Revenue Act. 5. Having heard the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and on perusal of the averments made in the writ petition, I am of the view that the petitioner is having an efficacious remedy under Section - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304762026 NC: 2026:KHC:49645 WP NO.14330 OF 2026 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act to challenge the mutation order passed by the respondent No.2 in respect of the subject land. Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioner to exhaust the remedy available under the aforesaid provision, writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23