Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030000532026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/6/2026 Smt. Lalbiakdingi D/o Vanlalnghaka, Falkland Veng, Aizawl VERSUS The State of Mizoram R/b the Secretary to Govt. of Mizoram, Home Dept. and Anr. Aizawl2:Officer-in-Charge Bawngkawn Police Statio Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalramdinthara Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram Linked Case : Crl.Rev.P./2/2026 Smt. Lalbiakdingi D/o Vanlalnghaka Falkland Veng Aizawl VERSUS The State of Mizoram R/b Secretary to Govt. of Mizoram Home Dept. Aizawl 2:The Officer-in-Charge Bawngkawn Police Station Aizawl Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalramdinthara Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP Mizoram B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 12.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. Lalramdinthara, learned Legal Aid Counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Public Prosecutor, appearing for the State respondent. 2. This application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, has been filed by the applicant, namely, Smt. Lalbiakdingi, who is praying for condoning the delay of 96 days in filing the connected revision petition by which the applicant has impugned the order dated 05.08.2025, passed in Crl.Misc. Case No. 61 of 2025, in connection with Bawngkawn P.S. Case No. 420 of 2024, by the Court of learned Special Judge, ND&PS Act, Aizawl. 3. The learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the cause of approaching this Court beyond the prescribe period of limitation has been mentioned in Paragraph No. 2 of the instant Interlocutory Application. He Page No.# 3/3 submits that these reasons shown were beyond the control of the applicant and hence, same may be regarded as sufficient. He therefore, prays for condoning the delay of 96 days. 4. Ms. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Public Prosecutor, considering the reasons shown by the applicant in the Interlocutory Application does not raised any objection against prayer for condoning the delay. 5. After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides, as well as considering the reasons shown in the instant Interlocutory Application as sufficient cause which prevented the applicant in preferring the connected Revision Petition within the prescribe period of limitation, the instant Interlocutory Application is hereby allowed and delay of 96 days in filing the connected Revision Petition is condoned. 6. The Registry to list the connected Revision Petition after a week from the date of this order. 7. This Interlocutory Application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant