Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010290492024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2925/2024 Between: 1. PSR CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI K. MADHAVA RAO, S/O. LATE PEDDA MALAKONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. DARAKANIPADU VILLAGE, GUDLUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. V SAI RAM PRASAD, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION, VIJAYAWADA. 4. P KRISHNA MOHAN, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, SPSR NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 2 5. MAYANI BABU REDDY, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, VENKATAGIRI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. P MUJAHIDH KHAN, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MI SUB DIVISION, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. THOKALA ANNAMADABABU, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MI SUB DIVISION, RAPUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. R HARISH KUMAR, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SECTION OFFICE, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 9. THOTA BHUPATI, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SECTION OFFICE, VENKATAGIRI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 10. P RAMANA REDDY, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. THE ASST. PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, SOMASILA PROJECT, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience and deliberately violating the orders passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No. 33390 of 2023, dated 04.04.2024 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with filing certified copy of judgment dated 04.04.2024 passed in W.P. No. 33390 of 2023 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of Respondent 3 No.2 on 30.01.2026, as directed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 05.01.2026, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to recall the Bailable Warrant issued against the Respondent No.3 in C.C.No.2925 of 2024 dated 30.01.2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 4. SARANU PHANI TEJA The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2925/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.33390 of 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents furnished written instructions and payment particulars. As per the written instructions, the amount i.e., Rs.28,00,000/- as claimed by the petitioner and as directed by this Court on 04.04.2024 was already paid. As per the statement filed before this Court, it indicates that the respondents paid Rs.29,45,000/-. In view of the payment made as directed by this Court, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not refute the same. 5. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 29.06.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 5 27 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2925/2024 29.06.2026 BSP/TPS