- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010275802020 NC: 2026:KHC:50155 WP No. 5583 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 5583 OF 2021 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: SRI. P.SRINIVASA, S/O. LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT YADEYURU VILLAGE, BAGALURU POST, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RANGASWAMAIAH R.L., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010275802020 NC: 2026:KHC:50155 WP No. 5583 of 2021 4. SRI. C.ANJINAPPA, S/O. LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, R/AT BAGALURU VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. K.SHIVASHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Smt.Spoorthi V.HCGP, counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri.K.Shivashankar, counsel for respondent No.4 appeared in person. The matter was listed 09.09.2026. On that day also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and for - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010275802020 NC: 2026:KHC:50155 WP No. 5583 of 2021 appearance of counsel for the petitioner, it was ordered to be listed today i.e., 15.09.2026. It was also made clear that if none appears on the next date of hearing, the Court will proceed to pass orders on the merits of the case. As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28.1