Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4024 (UTT)

DR MANJU YADAV v. SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION

WPSB/117/2026 · 2026-02-27

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1426-DB HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 2 7 TH FEBRUARY, 2 0 2 6 W RI T PETI TI ON ( S/ B) NO. 1 17 OF 2 0 2 6 Dr. Manju Yadav …...Petitioner. Ver su s State of Uttarakhand & others ….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel. Counsel for the State : Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel with Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel. JUDGMENT :(per Mr . Man oj Kum ar Gu pt a, C.J.) 1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to adjust the petitioner on any of the following vacant posts: - “1. M.B. Government P.G. College, Haldwani. 2. Government P.G. College, Halduchaur. 3. Government P.G. College, Kapkot. 4. Government P.G. College, Kashipur.” 2. The petitioner is working as an Assistant Professor (Home Science) at Government P.G. College, Joshimath, Chamoli since her initial appointment as Assistant Professor. 3. Joshimath, Chamoli is a durgam posting. The petitioner has already completed three years at Chamoli. She has filed representations seeking transfer to a sugam place. However, since previous year was declared as “zero session”, therefore, transfers were not effected and, for 1 2026:UHC:1426-DB which reason, the petitioner remained at Chamoli. 4. In the aforesaid backdrop, the present writ petition has been filed seeking direction for posting of the petitioner at any of the sugam places. 5. Learned State Counsel submits that the prayer of the petitioner for transfer to a sugam place would be considered in the coming transfer season, which is to start from May, 2026. He further submits that the previous year was declared as “zero session”, as at the time transfers were to be effected, the Model Code of Conduct was in force in the State in view of the Panchayat elections and by the time the same was withdrawn, the transfer season was over. 6. Having regard to the stand taken by learned State Counsel, we dispose of the instant writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer to a sugam place in the ensuing transfer season strictly as per the Transfer Policy. 7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dated: 27th February, 2026 NI SHANT 2 NISHANT KUMAR Digitally signed by NISHANT KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=ad3fcb5ca64340f5dd0a4c574afa0fd63133605ca57cdc 00ec2b7462b452b326, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=7E81318F3B1BE7EAAC9370185F7C9C20892BC63 A055CFD1961690560487E670C, cn=NISHANT KUMAR Date: 2026.02.27 17:41:56 +05'30'