Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4024 (RAJ)

RAMKESH S/O NARESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1637/2026 · 2026-04-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13997] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1637/2026 Ramkesh S/o Naresh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bhopur Police Station Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In Distt. Jail Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.262/2025 registered at Police Station Balghat, District Karauli for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 329(3), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that according to the medical opinion, alleged injury could be dangerous but the injury report of the injured Shree Ram, does not support the claim that the injuries are dangerous to life as the report itself states that all the injuries are simple in nature. The medical officer's report is not based on the factual assessment of [2026:RJ-JP:13997] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1637/2026] the injuries. The petitioner has been in custody since 26.12.2025. Though five criminal antecedents have been reported against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. Charge- sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ramkesh S/o Naresh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial and if he found involved in such type of cases then complainant has the right to move the application for cancellation of this bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/8