Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40211 (CAL)

SUNIL KUMAR RAY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22793/2026 · 2026-09-11

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14 Ranajit (AR.CT) 11.09.2026 Ct.05 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. NO 22793 OF 2026 Sunil Kumar Ray -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subhajyoti Das ….for the petitioner. Mr. Soujanyo Pattanayak, Mr. Rhidhiman Mukherjee ….for the respondent nos.7 to 10. Mr. D. N. Ray, Mr. Atanu Basu, Ms. Ritoprita Ghosh ….for the State. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing petitioner submits that after filing of writ petition on 24th August, 2026 taking note of complaint FIR was registered by concerned police authorities being Bhatar Police Station Case No. 461/2026 dated 2nd September, 2026. 3. State respondents and respondent nos. 7 to 10 are represented by learned advocates. 4. Since based on complaint FIR is registered and aforesaid criminal prosecution is initiated, at this stage no further order is warranted. 5. Writ petition stands disposed of. 6. However, this order shall not preclude petitioner to approach jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS 2023, if occasion so arises. 7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.) 2