Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40200 (KAR)

SRI SHIVAKUMAR M v. SMT. SHASHIREKHA

CRL.P/8081/2020 · 2026-09-19

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010408752020 NC: 2026:KHC:51491 CRL.P No. 8081 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8081 OF 2020 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHIVAKUMAR M., S/O MALLAIAH B.M, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. 2. SRI. MALLAIAH B.M. S/O MALLAIAH, AGEDA BOUT 58 YEARS. 3. SMT. BHABYAMMA W/O MALLAIAH B.M, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, (SHIVAKUMAR S MOTHER). ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.17, 8TH CROSS, VRUSHABHAVATHI NAGARA, MARUTHI NAGARA, BENGALURU-560079. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIRISH S., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. SHASHIREKHA, W/O SHANKARA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.825, 16TH MAIN, GOKULA, 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560054. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010408752020 NC: 2026:KHC:51491 CRL.P No. 8081 of 2020 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY KAMAKSHIPALYA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUHAS GOWDA M., HCGP FOR R2; R1 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.119/2020 OF KAMAKSHIPALYA POLICE FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 354, 323, 504, 506, 34 OF IPC, PENDING BEFORE THE 5TH A.C.M.M. AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER When this matter was listed on 15.09.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioners was absent. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This petition is filed in the year 2020 and the learned counsel for the petitioners is not pursuing the matter diligently even after lapse of six years. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD/ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45