HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8021 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondents. 3. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition is to direct the Respondent No.2 namely Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Gorakhpur to consider and decide the Case No.RST/4070 of 2025, (Computerized Case No.T202505310304070), (Smt. Dhanpatiya vs. Nandlal and others), within stipulated period. 4. Heard counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Respondent No.2 namely Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Gorakhpur, to decide the aforesaid case strictly in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment, unless there is no legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Kumar Sahani, Narendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Prakash Padia,J.) Smt. Dhanpatiya .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad