Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010848102025 NC: 2026:KHC:49196-DB WA No. 2093 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA WRIT APPEAL NO. 2093 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN:
1. G. SANTHIRAM, S/O. P.K. GOPALAN, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.383/B, RAILWAY OFFICERS QUARTERS, MG RAILWAY COLONY, MAGADI ROAD POST, BENGALURU-560 023. 2. G. VASUNDARA LAKSHMI W/O. S. VENKATARAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT NO.385, 38TH A CROSS 26TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 069 G.P.A HOLDER SRI. S. SUNIL KUMAR, R/AT NO.385, 38TH A CROSS, 26TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 069. 3. M. HAROONAL RASHEED, S/O. LATE MAXHAULHAKH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT NO.26/2, 1ST CROSS, MARRAPPA GARDEN, BENSON TOWN POST, BENGALURU-560 046. Digitally signed by PAVITHRA B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010848102025 NC: 2026:KHC:49196-DB WA No. 2093 of 2025
4. SMT. PUSHPA W/O. K. LAKSHMAN, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.190/17, 18TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 011 G.P.A HOLDER SRI. RAKESH LAKSHMAN, R/AT NO.190/17, 18TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 011. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.B.S. MANIAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI. BASI REDDY JAYRAMI REDDY, S/O. B. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT LINGAREDDY PALLI VILLAGE, KALSAPADU MANDAPAM, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-516 210
2. SRI. KOPOLU NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O. LATE KOPPOLUJAGAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO. 7-4-76, CHEMUDUR, CHENNAMPALLI PANCHAYITI, BADAVEL MANDAMALA, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT, ANDRA PRADESH-516 210. 3. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, K-1 SUB-DIVISION, I FLOOR,
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010848102025 NC: 2026:KHC:49196-DB WA No. 2093 of 2025
T.T.M.C. BUILDING, KENGERI BANGALORE-560 060. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. H.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN WP NO.25959/2025 AND SET ASIDE THE SAID IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10/10/2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P NO.25959/2025 AND DISMISS THE WRIT PETITION BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT APPEAL AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2.
A memo has today been filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition from which this appeal arises
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010848102025 NC: 2026:KHC:49196-DB WA No. 2093 of 2025
i.e., W.P.No.25959/2025. However, we notice that the memo seeks leave of this Court for filing a writ petition after impleading the appellants. We also notice that WP.No.25959/2025 had been filed without disclosing the pendency of W.P.No.261/2022 and the interim order dated 27.03.2025 is passed in that writ petition. The memo reads as under: MEMO The appellants have called in question the order passed in W.P. No.25959/2025 allowing the Writ Petition and also sought leave to question the orders passed by the Writ Petition since they have not impleaded before the learned Single Judge. The Respondent No.1 and 2 submit that they seek leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the Writ Petition bearing No.25959/2025 on the file of the learned Single Judge of this Hon'ble Court and further seek leave to seek redressal in the appropriate manner in accordance with law by filing a writ Petition after impleading the Appellants before this Hon'ble Court. Wherefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition bearing
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010848102025 NC: 2026:KHC:49196-DB WA No. 2093 of 2025
No.25959/2025 on the file of the learned Single Judge of this Hon'ble Court us withdrawn permitting liberty to file another Writ Petition after impleading the Appellants in accordance with law, in the interest of justice and equity."
3. In the above view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the leave sought to file a further writ petition in the matter cannot be granted. W.P.No.25959/2025 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of withdrawal of W.P.No.25959/2025, nothing further survives for consideration in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE
PB, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8