Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40191 (CAL)

MAHADEB HALDER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1133/2026 · 2026-09-10

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.09.2026 Serial no. 38 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 1133 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Malda Town GRPS PS Case No. 21 of 2025 dated 18.03.2025 u/s 85/103(1)/238(a) of the BNS. -And- In the matter of : Mahadeb Halder … Petitioner(s) Md. Wasim Akram Ms. S. Parveen … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Brajesh Jha, APP Mr. Aniruddha Sarkar … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 18.03.2025 and since then he is in custody. The petitioner is the husband and the incident happened after about 14 years of marriage. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that throat of the victim was slit down and the body was thrown in the railway track. Learned advocate for the petitioner argues that the victim has committed suicide. However, the petitioner is facing charges under section 103(1) of the BNS and the evidence of P.W.1 is in progress. 2 Having considered the gravity and heinousness of the offence, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting bail to the present petitioner. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1133 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)