1 M/L 161 11.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (A) 2603 of 2026 Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty & Ors. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Khatra Police Station Case No. 79 of 2026 dated 14.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/127(2)/115(2)/117(2)/308(7)/109/324(4)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 341/342/323/325/389/307/427/34 of the IPC, 1860 read with Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. And In the matter of : 1. Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty 2. Tuhin Tushar Mandi 3. Jyotsna Mandi ……Petitioners. Mr. Debasish Roy Mr. Avik Ghatak Mr. Akash Ghosh …for the Petitioners Mr. Rajendra Banerjee Mr. Snehasis Banerjee …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been implicated in connection with the instant case pursuant to change of administration. 2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. I have taken into account the nature of the accusations and is of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioners namely 1. Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty 2. Tuhin Tushar Mandi 3. Jyotsna Mandi are unwarranted. 2 4. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, 1. Tuhinsuvra Chakraborty @ Tuhinsubhra Chakraborty 2. Tuhin Tushar Mandi 3. Jyotsna Mandi be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 5. As the investigation of the case is in progress, petitioner no. 1 and petitioner no. 2 shall make themselves available before the Investigating Officer within a period of ten days from the date of the order and shall subsequently follow the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the report in final form is submitted before the jurisdictional Court. So far as the petitioner no. 3 is concerned she would make herself available as and when required by the Investigating Officer. 6. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2603 of 2026 is allowed. 7. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)