09.01.2026 Sl. 622 Ct. 551 (Samar) WPA 3824 of 2025 With I.A No. CAN 1of 2025 Dipak Kumar Pradhan Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Mr. Atindranath Misra ….for the petitioner. Mr. DwijadasChakraborty, Ms.Rama Chakraborty, …. for the Union of India. 1. The learned advocate appearing for the Union of India submits that the names of the learned Advocates representing the Union of India have been inadvertently missed in the order dated December 19, 2025. Let their names be recorded in the order dated December 19, 2025. Re: CAN 1 of 2025 1. CAN 1 of 2025 is an application seeking addition of one Akash Pradhan being the son of the petitioner as a party to the present writ petition. 2. It is submitted that his name had been inadvertently missed to be added in the writ petition 3. Let the applicant Akash Pradhan be added as party in the array of the petitioners. The 2 application for addition of party being CAN 1 of 2025 stands disposed of. 4. The petitioner shall correct the cause title of the writ petition by adding applicant Akash Pradhan in the writ petition. WPA 3824 of 2025 5. The petitioner is complains of inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the petitioner’s representation dated January 10, 2025. 6. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is a land loser. It is submitted that the petitioner land had been acquired by the South Eastern Railways for the purpose of a special railway project and no compensation therefore has been paid to the said petitioner as yet. 7. It is further submitted that despite acquisition of the petitioner’s land, land loser’s certificate has also not been issued in favour of the petitioner. 8. Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties and considered the materials on record. 9. Since, the petitioner has made a representation dated January 10, 2025 to the General Manager, South Eastern Railway, the said authority is requested to consider the representation dated January 10, 2025 and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order. It is 3 clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and the General Manager, South Eastern Railway shall be fee to take appropriate decision independently, in accordance with law. 10. WPA 3824 of 2025 stands disposed of with the above observations. There shall be no order as to costs. 11. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied as expeditiously as possible. (Om Narayan Rai, J. )