Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40148 (CAL)

TANIA KHATUN v. SHAILENDRA UTTAM, REGIONAL DIRECTOR (EASTERN REGION) AND ORS.

CPAN/19/2026 · 2026-09-11

Aniruddha Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.09.2026 In The High Court at Calcutta Ct. No. 38 Special Civil Jurisdiction Sl. No. 19 Appellate Side Contempt Moumita CPAN 19 of 2026 in WPA 22538 of 2025 Tania Khatun -Vs.- Shri Shailendra Uttam, Regional Director (Easter Region) Staff Selection Commission, 1st MSO Buildings (8th Floor), 234/4, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata – 700 020. Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Mondal, Adv. Ms. Sharmistha Dhar, Adv. ….For the Petitioner Mr. Siddhartha Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. Mr. Gourab Karmakar, Adv. ….For the Alleged Contemnors Mr. Siddhartha Sankar Mondal, learned advocate with Ms. Sharmistha Dhar, learned advocate appears for the petitioner. Mr. Siddhartha Bhattacharya, learned Advocate with Mr. Tapan Bhanja, learned Advocate and Mr. Gourab Karmakar, learned Advocate appears for the alleged contemnors. Learned Advocate appearing for the alleged contemnors has submitted that, a compliance report by way of an affidavit, the same is taken on record. The report shows as also the parties confirmed that, the direction of this Court has 2 been complied with. Copy of the report has been served upon the petitioner. In view of the above, this contempt proceeding CPAN 19 of 2026 stands dropped and closed. The application CPAN 19 of 2026 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs. (Aniruddha Roy, J.)