Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40144 (KAR)

SRI MANJUNATH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/24550/2026 · 2026-09-16

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010537362026 NC: 2026:KHC:50598 WP No. 24550 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24550 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O LATE MUNIRAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT BANDENALLASANDRA VILLAGE JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RUPESH R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA ) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010537362026 NC: 2026:KHC:50598 WP No. 24550 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 (TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK) TO MUTATE THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN REVENUE RECORDS WITH RESPECT OF THE PROPERTIES ALLOTTED TO HIM UNDER THE FINAL DECREE IN O.S. NO. 61/2017 (REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NO. ANK-1-06581-2020-21) WITHIN FOUR WEEKS (ANNEXURE - A THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondent No. 2 to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, in - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010537362026 NC: 2026:KHC:50598 WP No. 24550 of 2026 terms of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 61/2017 (Annexure-A). 4. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to make a representation to respondent No. 2 along with a copy of the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 61/2017. If such a representation is made by the petitioner, respondent No. 2 shall consider the same in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of the representation. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20