Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40141 (KAR)

ULLAS. B v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/12188/2026 · 2026-09-16

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010551862026 NC: 2026:KHC:50565 CRL.P No. 12188 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12188 OF 2026 BETWEEN: ULLAS. B, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, S/O UMESH, R/ O BURUDEGHATTA NELLEKERE POST, NONAVINAKERE TUMAKURU-572224, PETITIONER HEREIN MENTIONED HIS NAME AGE FATHER NAME AND ADDRESS AS PER AADHAR CARD BECAUSE IN THE FIR BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE. …PETITIONER (BY SRI BALASUBRAMANYA B N.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TUMAKURU CEN CRIME POLCIE STATION, TUMAKURU REP BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING,BENGALURU-560001. 2. POOJA S, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, W/O SPOORTY B S, R/O TURUVEKERE ROAD, OPPOSITE KRISHNAPPA SAW MILL, K B CROSS, TIPTUR TQ, TUMAKURU-572114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M V ANOOP KUMAR, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) Digitally Signed by ANANT RAMNATH HEGDE - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010551862026 NC: 2026:KHC:50565 CRL.P No. 12188 of 2026 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR.NO.80/2025 BY THE TUMAKURU CEN CRIME P.S., TUMAKURU / 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 66D OF IT ACT AND SEC. 318(4) AND 319(2) OF THE BNS 2023 NOW THE CASE IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE III ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TUMAKURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Learned Additional State Public Prosecutor accepts notice for respondent No.1-State. 2. The complaint is filed alleging that the petitioner sent a link through WhatsApp assuring that the loan will be sanctioned if necessary, details are furnished. It is alleged that the complainant has logged in to the link sent by the petitioner. Some amount is collected from the complainant. Thereafter, the loan is not sanctioned. It is also stated that amount is also credited to the account of the petitioner. In this behalf, a complaint is filed. Digitally Signed by ANANT RAMNATH HEGDE - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010551862026 NC: 2026:KHC:50565 CRL.P No. 12188 of 2026 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has nothing to do with the transactions referred to in the complaint and the email ID which is mentioned in the complaint does not belong to the Petitioner. 4. The Additional SPP would submit that the matter requires investigation as it is alleged in the complaint that amount is credited to the account of the petitioner. Since it submitted that the amount is credited to the account of the petitioner and the petitioner told the complainant about the aforementioned email ID or aforementioned Online portal, the Court is of the view that the matter requires investigation. 5. Hence, the petition is dismissed. 6. Merely because the petition is dismissed, it does not mean that the Court has expressed anything against the petitioner. Digitally Signed by ANANT RAMNATH HEGDE - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010551862026 NC: 2026:KHC:50565 CRL.P No. 12188 of 2026 7. The matter has to be investigated in accordance with law. (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CHS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 41 Digitally Signed by ANANT RAMNATH HEGDE