Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40132 (CAL)

RAJEN BANSFORE v. SHAILENDRA UTTAM, REGIONAL DIRECTOR (EASTERN REGION) SSC

CPAN/288/2026 · 2026-09-11

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ml- 1382 Ranajit (AR.CT) 11.09.2026 Ct.05 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTINO (Appellate Side) CPAN 288 OF 2026 IN W.P.A. NO 26690 OF 2025 Rajen Bansfore -vs- Sri Shailendra Uttam, Regional Director (Eastern Region) Staff Selection Commission & Ors. Mr. Shamit Sanyal, Ms. Sanchayita De ….for the applicant. Ms. Chandreyi Alam, Mr. Subhajit Das ….for the alleged contemnors. 1. Though in terms of order dated 7th August, 2026 affidavit-of-service is not filed on behalf of applicant but learned advocates representing applicant and alleged contemnors have jointly submitted that applicant was granted benefit of height relaxation and in Detailed Medical Examination (DME) applicant was declared medically fit. 2. In view of steps taken by alleged contemnors, contempt application is disposed of. 3. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)