Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4011 (GAU)

HAMIDUL ISLAM AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/591/2026 · 2026-04-05

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010019842026 2026:GAU-AS:5076 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/591/2026 HAMIDUL ISLAM AND ANR S/O- IDRIS ALI, PERMANENT R/O- KARAITARI, FAKIRAGRAM, P.S.- KOKRAJHAR, DIST.- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM- 783345 CURRENTLY RESIDING AT -DR. BHUPEN HAZARIKA PATH, DATAPARA KATABARI, FATASHIL, AMBARI, GUWAHATI, DIST. -KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. 2: SMTI. ANISHA PRADHAN D/O- JYOTISH PRADHAN. PERMANENT R/O- EAST KHASI HILLS MEGHALAYA P.O.- MEGHALAYA P.S.- MEGHALAYA PIN- 793014. CURRENTLY RESIDING AT - ADARSH PATH BY LANE NO.5 SATH GAON P.S.- UDAM VIHAR VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT., GOVT. OF ASSAM, JANATA BHAWAN, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM -781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781006. Page No.# 2/3 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) ASSAM-781036. 4:THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER - CUM - MARRIAGE OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER LICHUBAGAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI KAMRUP(M) ASSAM - 781036 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. G. Kaushik, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Roy, Govt. Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 06.04.2026 Heard Mr. G. Kaushik, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. S. S. Roy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State Respondents. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the marriage between the petitioners has been solemnized before the Sub-Registry, Kamrup (Metro). Page No.# 3/3 3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed as it has become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant