2026:HHC:5431 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 2229 of 2026 Decided on : 03.03.2026 Vinod Kumar …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed representation (Annexure P-2) with regard to the issues raised in the petition, but the same has not been decided by the Authority concerned till date. 3. Accordingly, as prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representation (Annexure P-2) of 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:5431 the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of 12 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 03, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)