Vasudhaika Agritech Pvt Ltd, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14117/2025 · 2026-06-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4010 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4010 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement : 24-06-2026 Date of uploading
: 04-07-2026
APHC010238612025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14117/2025 Between:
1. VASUDHAIKA AGRITECH PVT LTD,, REP BY ITS C.E.O., D.NO.
PLOT NO. 3, D.NO. 12-2015/2, TADEPALLI MUNICIPALITY, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, M. NO. 9154184618.
2. VALLABHANENI SRINIVAS CHARKRAVARTHY, S/O. V RAMA RAO, D.NO.406, R K APARTMENTS, K C ROAD, OPP. ANDHRA BANK, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI, BELLARY - 583101, KARNATAKA
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AT AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR.
3. THE DISTRICT AGRICULTURE OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTOR OFFICE COMPLEX,
SRIKAKULAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE,
2
NARASANNAPETA,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER, AGRICULTURE OFFICE, NARASANI IAPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6. THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER, AGRICULTURE OFFICE, SARAVAKOTA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
7. THE AGRICULTURE OFFICER, AGRICULTURE OFFICE, JALUMURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or more particularly Writ of mandamus that declaring the action of the Respondents for not releasing the balance amount of Rs. 28,31,579/- (Rupees Twenty Eight Lakhs Thirty One Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Nine only) towards the tarpaulins supplied as per the invoices mentioned above is illegal, arbitrary, contrary and violation of fundamental rights as guaranteed under Articles 14, 300 (A) of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the balance amount of Rs.28,31,579/- (Rupees Twenty Eight Lakhs Thirty One Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Nine only) along with applicable interest and Pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S MURALI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14117/2025
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“....to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or
order or more particularly Writ of mandamus that declaring the action of the Respondents for not releasing the balance amount of Rs. 28,31,579/- (Rupees Twenty Eight Lakhs Thirty One Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Nine only) towards the tarpaulins supplied as per the invoices mentioned above is illegal, arbitrary, contrary and violation of fundamental rights as guaranteed under Articles 14, 300 (A) of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the balance amount of Rs.28,31,579/- (Rupees Twenty Eight Lakhs Thirty One Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Nine only) along with applicable interest…”
2. Heard Sri S.Murali Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. M. Sandhya Deepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Food and Agriculture for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that during pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioners has substantially been redressed. He further submits that the balance amount claimed by the petitioners has been released by the respondents and the due amount payable to the petitioners has been paid. In view of the subsequent developments, learned counsel would submit that no further orders are required in the present writ petition.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents does not dispute the submission made by the learned counsel for the
4
petitioners regarding release of the amount during the pendency of the writ petition.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the amount claimed in the writ petition has already been released and that the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.06.2026. UPS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
5
21 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14117/2025 Dt.24.06.2026
UPS