Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 401 (JHR)

SHAILENDER PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(SJ)/448/2025 · 2026-02-19

Sanjay Prasad

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:5029 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.448 of 2025 …. Shailender Prasad, Sex: Male, Aadhar Card.: 4437 0071 3715, Age about 31 years, son of Shri Shital Prasad, Address: Sakin : Lakhibagi, Police Station: Koderma, Post Office with Pin Code: Koderma (825410), District: Koderma, State: Jharkhand ……Appellant Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Devendra Kumar, Age 38 yrs.. S/o Bhusan Vill.Weol- Konha, Patna Road. At Barhi, P.O.+P.s.-Barhi, 825405, Dist.- Hazaribagh, Jharkhand ……Respondents ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the Appellant : Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. …… Order No.10/19th February 2026 1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant for granting relief under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [2 of 1974] or 380 of BNSS against the rejection orders passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- III of Shri Rakesh Chandra in the Civil Court at Koderma of the Jharkhand State in a Miscellaneous Criminal Application No.677 of 2024, and a Miscellaneous Criminal Application No.389 of 2024, the Interlocutory Application in a Session Trial No.58 of 20323, filed under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [2 of 1974] or 380 of BNSS before the learned Court where the Session Trial No.58 of 2023 is pending. 2. It appears from the Letter No.85 of 2026 dated 11.02.2026 sent by Sri Rakesh Chandra, learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Koderma, that the appellant namely Shailendra Prasad has been acquitted from the charges under Sections 341,323,307,325,504 & 427 of IPC. Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:5029 ) 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this appeal may be heard on merit of this case and necessary order may be passed as the appellant has been harassed by the Respondent No.2. 4. However, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 has submitted that the S.T. Case No.58 of 2023 (arising out of Chandwara P.S. Case No.89 of 2020) has been disposed of and the sole appellant has been acquitted in that case. 5. Thus, this Court is not inclined to entertain this issue as the appellant has been acquitted in connection with S.T. Case No.58 of 2023 (arising out of Chandwara P.S. Case No.89 of 2020). 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.448 of 2025 is dismissed. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 19.02.2026 Nishant/-