Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40096 (CHH)

RAMNIVAS PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2604/2026 · 2026-10-15

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010389732026 2026:CGHC:44834-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2604 of 2026 1 - Ramnivas Pandey S/o Ramashraya Pandey Aged About 50 Years R/o Godipara Chirmiri P.S. Chirmiri, District Manendragarh, Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer Police Station Baikunthpur District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi , Judge Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge 16/10/2026 1. The present CrMP has been filed by the petitioner for extension of time to deposit the cost as has been ordered by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 19.01.2026 passed in Cr.M.P. No. 194/2026. 2. Since, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner in repeated call, we proceed in the case and perused the application as well as order dated 19.01.2026. SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.10.16 16:51:29 +0530 2 3. By the order dated 19.01.2026, the petition for quashing of FIR, charge-sheet and entire criminal proceeding was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a duly constituted petition with the condition that he shall deposit a sum of Rs. 5000/- as cost in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from the date of such order and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Govt. Specialized Adoption Agency Bemetara (CG). Since, the petitioner could not deposit the amount of cost within such period, he moved the application for extension of time. 4. Though, the learned counsel for the petitioner has not appeared in repeated calls, we deem it appropriate to grant further seven working days to deposit the cost as has been ordered by Coordinate Bench of this Court on 19.01.2026. 5. Accordingly, further seven working days time from today is granted to the petitioner to deposit the cost as has been ordered by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 19.01.2026 in CrMP No. 194/2026. 6. The present Cr.MP is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Judge sagrika