Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40089 (CHH)

VINOD SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3436/2021 · 2026-10-08

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010209352021 2026:CGHC:43834 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3436 of 2021 Vinod Sahu S/o Chait Ram Sahu, Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Dadhipara, Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Post Daukapa, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 3 - Returning Officer, Panchayat Election, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 4 - Presiding Officers, (Panchayat Election Booth No. 362), Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 5 - Presiding Officers, (Panchayat Election Booth no. 363), Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 6 - Presiding Officers, (Panchayat Election Booth No. 364), Gram Panchayat- Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.10.12 11:51:29 +0530 2 7 - Vijay Khandekar S/o Bandhilal Khandekar Aged About 45 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 8 - Jitendra Kumar Sahu S/o Bholaram Sahu Aged About 28 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 9 - Nandu Mangeshkar S/o Udal Mangeshkar, Aged About 45 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 10 - Seth Kumar S/o Shankar Aged About 40 Years R/o Gram Panchayat Nathelapara, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Raveena, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Dr. Arham Siddique, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/10/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay