IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74087 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2025 Thana- Sarbahada District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Sujant Kumar @ Surjant Kumar S/O Sambhu Sharan R/O Village-Hemra P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya, State- Bihar. 2. Guddu Kumar S/O Ramdeo Mahto @ Ramdeo Prasad R/O Village-Hemra P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya, State- Bihar. 3. Ranjit Kumar S/O Kamanand Mahto @ Karmanand R/O Village-Hemra P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya, State- Bihar. 4. Prince Kumar @ Vivek Kumar S/O Parmanand Mahto @ Parmanand Prasad R/O Village-Hemra P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya, State- Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prithivi Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 11-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 132, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of seven years and less, as such petitioners were given the benefit of Section 35 BNSS and the petitioners during the course of investigation cooperated and police never felt the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74087 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 need of arresting the petitioners, but then charge-sheet came to be submitted based on which cognizance came to be taken, hence petitioners apprehend arrest. It is next submitted that when police during the course of investigation never felt the need of arresting the petitioners and petitioners cooperated in the investigation, whether it would be prudent for the court to send the petitioners to jail. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sarbahda P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T