Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010051242026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/934/2026 ON THE DEATH OF SHONGU BIBI HER LEGAL HEIRS ABDUL GAFUR AND ORS S/O- LATE NIMAR ALI, R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II, P.O. KALIBARI, P.S. ALGAPUR, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 2: LAILA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3: HASNA BEGUM BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4: MONOWARA BEGUM CHOUDHURY C/O SELIM UDDIN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UTTAR KANCHANPUR PART II P O CHIPERSANGAN DIST HAILAKANDI ASSA VERSUS ABDUL HOQUE BARBHUIYA AND ORS S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI, R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II, P.S. ALGAPUR, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 2:ABDUL REJAK BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3:ABDUL MOTIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4:BAHAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA @ YASIN ALI S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5:ABU KASHIM BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6:SAMSUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 7:FAKAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 8:BIBI AYESHA W/O- HAZI TAYUB ALI R/O- BAKRIHAWAR PART-VI P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI Page No.# 3/4 PIN- 788802. 9:ABDUL HASIB LASKAR SECRETARY JUKURGRAM MASJID R/O- VILL.- CHIPORSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPORSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788801 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H I CHOUDHURY, MR. N HAQUE,MR. S R BARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, MR. M H SAIKIA (R-1 TO 9),MR. N I MAZARBHUYAN (R-1 TO 9) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 06.04.2026 Heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. R.R. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. This application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, is preferred by the applicants for condoning the delay of 45 days in preferring the application for substitution of the legal heirs of the appellant No. 5 in the connected RSA. 3. Mr. Haque, learned counsel for the applicants submits that the delay is not intentional, rather it is circumstantial and therefore, it is contended to allow this petition. 4. On the other hand, Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that he has no objection. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, this Court is of the view Page No.# 4/4 that delay has been sufficiently explained and accordingly, the same stands allowed. 6. The delay of 45 days in filing the application for substitution of the legal heirs of the appellant No. 5 in the connected RSA, stands condoned. 7. In terms of above, this IA stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant