Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40051 (CHH)

ROHIT MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7494/2026 · 2026-10-12

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010403412026 2026:CGHC:44213 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7494 of 2026 1 - Rohit Mishra S/o Late Shri V.R. Mishra Aged About 40 Years R/o Behar Gali, Chhote Mathpara Sarangarh, Tahsil- Sarangarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chairman/ Additional Chief Secretary, Committee Of Senior Secretaries (Transfer Matter), Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Ps And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Ps And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector (Land Record Branch) Office Of Collector (Land Record Branch), Sarangarh, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Office Of Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sarangarh, District - Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Dy.G.A. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 13/10/2026 AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.10.14 10:43:25 +0530 2 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner is questioning the order of posting dated 06.07.2026 (Annexure P-1), whereby he has been posted from P.H. No. 49, Goda, to P.H. No. 39, Gwalindeeh, Tehsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner questioning the impugned order dated 06.07.2026 on the ground that the petitioner's mother, aged about 64 years, is suffering from various health issues. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, learned counsel prays that the present writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Collector for redressal of his grievance. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that he has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents available on record. 5. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Collector by filing a representation. In the event such a representation is filed, the Collector shall consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep