Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40037 (CHH)

RAVNEET SINGH SALUJA v. RAVNEET KAUR

FA(MAT)/145/2026 · 2026-10-07

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Smt Sushma Sawant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010150242026 2026:CGHC:43608- DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA(MAT) No. 145 of 2026 Ravneet Singh Saluja S/o Late Kamaljeet Singh Saluja Aged About 28 Years R/o Shyam Nagar Raipur, Police Station- Telibandha, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) Mo. No. 8982076668 ... Applicant Versus Ravneet Kaur W/o Shri Ravneet Singh Saluja, D/o Sardar Surendar Pal Singh Aged About 28 Years R/o- Career Point Street, Dayalband Bilaspur, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Ratnesh Agrawal, Advocate, along with appellant in person. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate along with father of the respondent. DB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge & Hon’ble Smt. Sushma Sawant, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 08/10/2026 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present first appeal, being FA(MAT) No. 145 of 2026, has been filed challenging only the award of permanent alimony of Rs. 40,00,000/-. He further submits that a child was born out of the VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2026.10.13 16:47:29 +0530 2 relationship between the parties and that the appellant is maintaining the child. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent, submits that as per instructions received from the respondent and her father present in Court, the respondent does not wish to claim permanent alimony and is relinquishing her right to claim the permanent alimony as ordered. Father of the respondent present also stated that her daughter will not claim the alimony, as she some how wants to get rid of the proceedings. 3. In view of the submission made on behalf of the respondent, on instructions in the presence of the respondent’s father, that the respondent does not wish to claim permanent alimony, the appeal to that extent is allowed. The judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court of granting a decree of divorce under Section 13(1)(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is maintained, however, the judgment and decree granting permanent alimony is set aside. 4. Let the decree be drawn accordingly. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sushma Sawant) Judge Judge vaibhav