BABLI KUMARI GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
WPC/6463/2025 · 2026-03-25
Sri Ananda Sen
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4002 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4002 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8608 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No.6463 of 2025
-------
1. Babli Kumari Gupta, aged about 40 years, D/o Binod Prasad Sah, R/o Purana Dumka, Kewat Para, P.O. Dumka, P.S. Dumka Town & District-Dumka. 2. Sumita Adhikary, aged about 39 years, W/o Bipad Taran Dutta, R/o College Road, Near Ghatsila College, P.O., P.S. Ghatsila & District- East Singhbhum. 3. Jayant Kumar Pandey, aged about 43 years, S/o Ala Pandey, R/o Village Lutipahari, P.O. Nadkhurkee, P.S. Baghmara & District- Dhanbad. 4. Imtiyaj Ansari, aged about 40 years, S/o Ramjan Ansari, R/o Village Hendegara, P.O. Hendegara, P.S. Charhi & District -Hazaribagh. 5. Renu Kumari Gupta, aged about 41 years, W/o Bhaskar Kumar, R/o Village Loyabad, P.O. Bansjora, P.S. Loyabad & District- Dhanbad. 6. Md. Nurul Islam, aged about 38 years, S/o Md. Maimul Shekh, R/o Village Mogalpara, P.O. Islampur, P.S. Barharwa & District- Sahibganj. 7. Vikash Kumar, aged about 42 years, S/o Sunil Kumar, R/o Village Chechariya, P.O., P.S. Nagar Untari & District-Garhwa. 8. Rajnath Chaudhary, aged about 37 years, S/o Ghura Chaudhary, R/o Village Datma, P.O. Rankabauliya, P.S. Garhwa & District- Garhwa. 9. Gautam Kumar Singh, aged about 36 years, S/o Umesh Prasad Singh, R/o Village Giribarawadih, P.O. Simariya, P.S. Dhanwar & District- Giridih. 10. Jai Prakash Thakur, aged about 44 years, S/o Radhey Shyam Thakur, R/o Village Haliwanta Kala, P.O. Haliwanta Kala, P.S. Nagar Untari & District- Garhwa. 11. Raghwendra Kumar Seth, aged about 44 years, S/o Om Prakash Seth, R/o Village Mirzaganj, P.O. Mirzaganj, P.S. Jamua & District- Giridih. Petitioner(s). Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, having its office at 1st floor, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District Ranchi,
2. The Secretary, School, Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, officiating at MDI Bhavan, Ground Floor, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District - Ranchi. 3. The Director, Primary Education, School, Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, officiating at MDI Bhavan, Ground Floor, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District Ranchi
4. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.O., P.S. Namkum & District - Ranchi. 5. The Chairman, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.O., P.S. Namkum & District - Ranchi. 6.
The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having its office at Kali Nagar, Chai Bagan, P.O., P.S. Namkum & District - Ranchi
… Respondents. -------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
------
03/ 25.03.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent-JSSC.
2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners pray for appointment on the post of Sahayak Acharya (Class VI to VIII).
3. It has been submitted that the petitioner Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 have already been recommended for appointment but their appointment letters is yet to be issued.
4. Considering the said submission, I direct the concerned authority to issue the appointment letters to the respondent Nos.3, 4, 5 and 6, if they are otherwise found fit.
5. So far as petitioner Nos.1, 2, 7, 8 and 11 are concerned, it has been submitted that they have obtained lesser mark than the last selected candidate.
6. Considering the same, no relief can be granted to the petitioner Nos.1, 2, 7, 8 and 11 at this stage.
7. Since the process of appointment is continuing, if any candidates in the category and subject of the petitioner Nos.1, 2, 7, 8 and 11, obtained lesser marks is recommended for appointment, they will approach the respondent- JSSC for appropriate relief. In that event, the respondent-JSSC will pass an appropriate order.
8. So far as the petitioner No.10 is concerned, it has been submitted that there are some issues with the educational certificate of the petitioner as the JSSC is reviewing the same.
9. Thus, I direct the respondent-JSSC to take a decision after considering the educational certificates and communicate the same to the petitioner No.10 within four weeks from today.
10. So far as petitioner No.9 is concerned, it has been submitted that there is some discrepancy in respect of the application form.
11. In that case also, I direct the Secretary, JSSC to take a decision on the candidature of this petitioner and communicate the same to the petitioner No.9 within three weeks from today itself.
12. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is
disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 25th March, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded on:30/03/2026
-2-