Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40018 (PAT)

Priyanka Kumari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./73040/2025 · 2026-02-13

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73040 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-625 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna ====================================================== Priyanka Kumari Wife of Sri Nagmani Kumar, D/o Sri Niranjan Singh Yadav Resident of Village - Chhoti Sandalpur(Sharma Toli), P.S. - Kasim Bazar, Dist. - Munger. At present residing at Ghasiyari Tola, P.S. - Chowk, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Nagmani Kumar S/O-Permanand prasad R/O--Chotti Sandalpur sharma toli p.s- Kasim Bazar dist- munger ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, APP For the State : Ms. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Raj Kumar Choudhary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 8 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no.2 by this Court vide order dated 23.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.10817 of 2024. 3. The parties to the proceedings have appeared along with their counsels. After interacting with the petitioner (wife), opposite party no.2 (husband) and father-in-law of the petitioner, this Court finds that the issues between the parties Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73040 of 2025(8) dt.13-02-2026 2/3 can still be resolved and the petitioner (wife) is ready to go along with the opposite party no.2 (husband) from the Court premises itself to Dehri-on-Sone where opposite party no.2 is posted as of now and lead a peaceful conjugal life with her husband without creating any ruckus either at the home or at the work place of the opposite party no.2. It has also been informed that the opposite party no.2 has been transferred to Raipur, Chattisgarh, but has not been relieved as yet. Till the time the opposite party no.2 is not relieved from Dehri-on-Sone, it is expected that he would keep his wife along with him due dignity and honor and in a situation when matter seems to be settled between the parties and they are leading a stable life at Dehri-on-Sone, then the child of the petitioner, who is presently staying at Munger and residing with petitioner’s father-in-law, would be handed over to the parents for his further upbringing and education, but in a situation when the opposite party will have to move on to Chattisgarh, the petitioner would go to Munger and stay at her matrimonial house where she would also get to stay along with her child. It is however made clear that her in-laws would not in any manner disturb her peaceful stay in the matrimonial house and in case, there is any such complaint the same may lead to any adverse order. It is also expected that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73040 of 2025(8) dt.13-02-2026 3/3 parents of both the sides would not be interfering in the peaceful marital life of the petitioner and the opposite party no.2. 4. With all the afore-mentioned observations and directions, the present application for cancellation of bail stands disposed of. anand/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T