Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010529342017 NC: 2026:KHC:49306 RSA No. 2378 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2378 OF 2017 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI GIDDAPPA
S/O CHOTTAPPA
DIED ON 30.07.2019. 1(a) SMT. JEENAMMA
W/O MANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
R/O JADEGERI MAJARE
NADAVALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI,
SORABA TALUK
SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 413. 1(b) SMT. RATHANAMMA
D/O LATE S. GIDDAPPA
W/O KARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/O. HECCHE VILLAGE
CHANDRAGUTTI POST,
SORABA TALUK
SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 413. 1(C) SRI. RAVINDRAPPA
S/O LATE S. GIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/O. JEDAGERI MAJARE
NADAVALLI HOBLI,
KASABA HOBLI
SORABA TALUK
SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 413. Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010529342017 NC: 2026:KHC:49306 RSA No. 2378 of 2017
1(d) SRI. BASAVANTHAPPA
S/O LATE S. GIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/O JEDAGERI MAJARE
NADAVALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI
SORABA TALUK
SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 413. 1(e) SMT. SUSHEELAMMA @ KALAVATHI
D/O LATE S. GIDDAPPA
W/O KERIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
R/O YELASI VILLAGE
SORABA TALUK
SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 413. 1(f) SRI.PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE S. GIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/O JEDAGERI MAJARE
NADAVALLI VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI
SORABA TALUK
SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 413. 1(h) SMT. AKKANAGAMMA @ ANITHA
D/O LATE S. GIDDAPPA
W/O BHASKAR
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/O. YADAGOPPA VILLAGE
UDRI POST, SORABA TALUK
SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 413. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. M R PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI SANNAPPA S/O CHOTAPPA @ KERIYAPPA R/O JEDAGERI MAJARE, NADAVALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, SORABA TALUK,
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010529342017 NC: 2026:KHC:49306 RSA No. 2378 of 2017
REPRESENTED BY P.A. HOLDER, SRI. KUMAR S/O SONNAPLPA MAJOR R/O JEDAGERI-MAJARE, NADAHALLI, SORABA TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT 577 413. SRI. THIPPANNA DEAD BY LRS
2. RAGHAVENDRA S/O GANAPATHI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
3. SHIVAKUMARA S/O GANAPATHI
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 4. SHEKHAPPA S/O THIPPANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 5. LAKSHMANAPPA S/O CHOTTAPPA @ KERIYAPLPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. R-2 TO R-5 ARE
R/O JEDAGERI MAJARE, NADAVALLI VILLAGE, KASAA HOBLI, SORABA TLAUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT 577 413. 6. MASTHYAPPA S/O CHOTTAPPA @ KERIYAPPA AT POST: HEBBATTI, SIRSI TALUK, KARWAR DISTRICT – 581 358. KARIYAMMA W/O KERIYAPPA DEAD BY LRS
7.
KARIYAPPA S/O KERIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/O HECCHE VILLAGE,
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010529342017 NC: 2026:KHC:49306 RSA No. 2378 of 2017
CHANDRAGUTTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGA DISTRICT – 577 429. 8. CHOLAPLPA S/O KERIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. R/O HECCHE VILLAG E, CHANDRAGUTTI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 429. 9. SMT. HUCHAMMA W/O CHAYAPPA R/O THEKKURU VILLAGE
SORABA TALUK
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 139. 10. SMT. SEETHAMMA W/O SHANMUKHAPPA R/O HULTHIKOPLPA VILALGE, SORABA LAUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 429. 11. SMT. KALAVATHI W/O MANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O SAREKOPPA VILLAGE, SORABA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 429. 12. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O DYAVAPPA
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/O OTURU VILLAGE, SORABA TLAUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 429. 13. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O MANJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/O JEDAGERI VILLAGE, SORABA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 429. …RESPONDENTS
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010529342017 NC: 2026:KHC:49306 RSA No. 2378 of 2017
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 01.08.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.09/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., SORABA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 10.09.2015 PASSED IN OS.NO.112/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC.,SORABA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo of even date which reads as under:
“In the above matter, the appellants most respectfully submits that the parties in the above appeal settled their dispute in FDP proceedings. Hence, the appeal may be dismissed as become infructuous in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. The said memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the appeal is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32