1 2026:CGHC:14903 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 64 of 2026 Bhanupratap S/o Rupsingh Aged About 30 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Raibar, P.S. Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh (Non- Applicant No. 1) ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Khelkumari W/o Shri Bhanupratap Aged About 30 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Bade Mudpar, P.S. Dabhra, Tahsil Malkharouda, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 2 - Rupsingh Aged About 55 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Raibar, P.S. Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 2) 3 - Smt. Sadhna W/o Rupsingh Aged About 50 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Raibar, P.S. Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh (Non- Applicant No. 3) 4 - Vinod Kumar S/o Rupsingh Aged About 33 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Raibar, P.S. Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh (Non- Applicant No. 4) 5 - Smt. Lata @ Ghansnin W/o Vinod Kumar Aged About 33 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Raibar, P.S. Pussore, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicant No. 5) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : None For Respondents : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.04.01 17:59:40 +0530 2 Order On Board 01/04/2026 1. The present Criminal Revision has been filed against the order dated 19.12.2023 passed by learned JMFC, Malkharoda, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) whereby the respondent No.1 has been granted Rs.2000/- per month as an interim maintenance. 2. On the previous date of hearing i.e. 17.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the applicant. 3. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the applicant which shows that he is not interested in pursuing the revision any further. 4. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the applicant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the revision for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the present Criminal Revision stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE Khatai