Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 400 (PNJ)

RAM LAL ALIAS RAM SIDH v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS

CWP/9277/2026 · 2026-03-27

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 140 CWP-9277-2026 Date of Decision: 27.03.2026 RAM LAL ALIAS RAM SIDH ...Petitioner Vs. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Krishan Kanha, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent-DHBVN *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of assessment order dated 21.09.2021 whereby respondent has raised demand of electricity charges of Rs.5,07,263/- and compounding notice dated 21.09.2021 whereby respondent has proposed compounding fee 2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that impugned order may be set aside with liberty to pass fresh order in view of judgment dated 13.03.2026 of this Court passed in CWP-35731-2025 titled as “Rattan Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.” 3. Disposed of in terms of Rattan Singh (supra). 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE March 27, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.03.27 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document