SRI. RAVINARAYANA REDDY. M. V. v. TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANTS CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD
WP/21039/2022 · 2026-09-15
Sachin Shankar Magadum
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39979 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 39979 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010489112022 NC: 2026:KHC:50100 WP No. 21039 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 21039 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. RAVINARAYANA REDDY. M. V.
S/O VENUGOPAL AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS BENGNOR VILLAGE, BANGARPET TOWN KOLAR DISTRICT-563114. 2. REDDYS TRADERS BENGNOR VILLAGE BANGARPET TOWN KOLAR DISTRICT-563114 BY ITS PROPRIETOR RAVINARAYANA REDDY M V S/O VENUGOPAL …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SIRI RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANTS CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD B H ROAD, TUMKUR-572103 BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER REGD UNDER KARNATAKA CO OP SOCIETIES ACT
2. RAJASHEKAR N ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER TUMKUR GRAIN MERCHANTS
Digitally Signed By:
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010489112022 NC: 2026:KHC:50100 WP No. 21039 of 2022
CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD B H ROAD, TUMKUR-572103. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. LOKESH .K.V AND LAW VIBES, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS BY THE R1 BANK UNDER THE SARFAESI PROCEEDINGS IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND ARBITRARY AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE POSSESSION NOTICES DTD 04.04.2022 VIDE NO.TGMCB/SEC/03/2022-23, AT ANNEXURE-E AND CONSEQUENTIAL NOTICE DTD 18.10.2022 VIDE NO.TGMCB/SEC/157/2022-23 AT ANNEXURE- G BY THE R1; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
Captioned petition is filed assailing the possession notice issued by the respondent/co-operative bank for a sum of Rs.2,33,00,000/-. 2. This Court vide order dated 21.10.2022 has stayed further proceedings. The records reveal that the interim order granted by this Court was not conditional. The right of a secured creditor to proceed against the secured assets cannot be interdicted at the hands of the Digitally Signed By:
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010489112022 NC: 2026:KHC:50100 WP No. 21039 of 2022
writ Court. Petitioner's counsel conveniently submits that his senior is not keeping well and he has no instructions and there is a part payment made by the petitioner. The amount due was Rs.2,33,10,066/- as on 04.04.2022.
If there is part payment and respondent-bank has abstained from taking any further course of action due to pendency of this writ petition, this Court, in the light of consistent view taken by the Hon'ble Apex Court that action contemplated by secured creditor cannot be interdicted by a writ Court, deems it fit to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the respondent-bank to proceed against petitioner if there is any money due to it. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
Digitally Signed By:
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM Verified