Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :30.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010076532017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4605/2017 Between: 1. SHAIK GALIB, KRISHNA DIST, S/O. LATE MADARSA R/O. ANUMANCHIPALLI VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHAIK MASTAN BEE KRISHNA DIST, W/o. Hussain R/o. Seetharamapuram, Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toto allow the CRP by setting aside the Order dated 20.08.2017 in I.A.No. 22/2017 in ASSR.19/2017 on the file of the court of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge court at Nandigamma, Krishna District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 6019 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay for all futher proceedings in O.S.No. 215/2006 including I.A.No. 100/2016 therein on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge COurt at 2 Jaggaiahpet, Krishna District pending disposal of the above revision and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4605/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the Order dated 20.07.2017 in I.A.No. 22 of 2017 in ASSR.19 of 2017 on the file of the court of XVI Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nandigamma, Krishna District. 2. Heard Sri T.Sohit Chandra, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri T.Sohit Chandra, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that that no cause survives for further adjudication in the Revision Petition and the matter becomes infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 30.06.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 33 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4605/2017 30.06.2026 BSP/TPS