IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75489 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2025 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Kaushal Kumar S/O Sh. Vashisth Singh R/O Vill.- Baigoman, Post- Punakla, P.S.- Paraiya, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Indradeo Yadav S/o Keshwar Yadav R/O-Village Baigoman, Post Punakala, P.S. Paraiya, District - Gaya (Bihar) 3. Sushma Devi W/o Keshav Sao R/O-Village Ajmatganj, P.S. Paraiya, District- Gaya (Bihar) 4. Vishwajeet Kumar S/o Ramashish Yadav R/O- Village Baigoman, Post- Punakala, P.S.- Paraiya, District - Gaya (Bihar) 5. Munni Kumari W/o Sunil Kumar R/O- Village Paraiya Khurd, P.S. -Paraiya, District- Gaya (Bihar) 6. Basanti Devi W/o Krishna Paswan R/O- Village - Ajmatganj, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya (Bihar) 7. Satyendra Singh S/o Late Ram Lagan Singh R/O-Village - Baigoman, Post- Punakala, P.S. - Paraiya, District - Gaya (Bihar) 8. Mithlesh Yadav S/o Sahdeo Yadav R/O Village - Punakala Tola- Lorhar, P.S.- Paraiya, District - Gaya (Bihar) 9. Manoj Kumar Sinha Licensed Deed Writer (L.N. 161/02) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 12-01-2026 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned APP for the State is present. 2. The petitioner has sought the cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party nos. 2 to 9 vide order dated 04.06.2025 passed by the court of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV, Gaya. It appears that the said order has been passed granting liberty to the opposite Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75489 of 2025(3) dt.12-01-2026 2/2 parties to file representation before the Investigating Officer of the case through the SHO, Paraiya police station and has been disposed of in view of the order passed in the case of Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar (Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024), hence I see no reason to interfere with the present order. 3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed. devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T