2026:JHHC:980 --1-- A.B.A. No. 112 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 112 of 2026 ---- 1. Morjina Bibi, aged about 26 years, wife of Monirul Shekh @ Milu Shekh 2. Suhana Parbin, aged about 27 years, wife of Mentarul Shekh 3. Najema Bibi, aged about 37 years, wife of Motiur Rahaman @ Dipu Shekh 4. Saima Bibi, aged about 37 years, wife of Sekh Imtiyaz Ahmed @ Imtiyaz Shekh 5. Mst. Kamrunnasa @ Kamrunnasa, aged about 21 years, wife of Mehrul Shaikh @ Tinku Shekh All are resident of village – Nabinagar, PO and PS – Malpahari O.P., District - Pakur .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate :- Ms. Savita Kumari, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Advocate ---- 02/15.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakur Malpahari P.S. Case No.177 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. Case No.701 of 2024, for offence registered under sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 132, 263(b), 262, 352, 351(3), 292, 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that 2026:JHHC:980 --2-- A.B.A. No. 112 of 2026 false allegations are made of assembling along with others and trying to take away one Tinku Sheikh from the police. He next submits that however, the said Tinku Sheikh has already been arrested by the police. He then submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons and the case has been registered against 13 persons and 20 to 30 unknown persons. He then submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph no.13 of the petition. He submits that in identical situation one co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.7534 of 2025. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that allegations are there against the petitioners of remaining in the association of antisocial elements. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons of trying to take away the said Tinku Sheikh and the petitioners happened to be ladies and they have got no criminal antecedent as aforesaid and in identical situation one co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABA, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing 2026:JHHC:980 --3-- A.B.A. No. 112 of 2026 bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur in connection with Pakur Malpahari P.S. Case No.177 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. Case No.701 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 15.01.2026 Sangam/