Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3995 (AP)

WATER USERS ASSOCIATION v. ANIL GARG,I.A.S

CC/2188/2022 · 2026-06-29

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 30.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010350642022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2188/2022 Between: 1. WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, MUNNELLI TANK, B.KODUR (M), YSR KADAPA DIST, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT O.RAJA MOHAN REDDY ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANIL GARG I A S, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. S S RAWAT IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 3. K SREENIVASULU, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. D VENKATRARNAIAH, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KADAPA DIVISION, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. A VENKATACHALAM, , THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER, IRRIGATION SUB-DIVISION, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to pleased to punish the Contemnor herein for willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed by His Lordship Sri Justice VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA in W.P.No.22983/2021, dt.23-02-2022 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. ASHOK RAM V 2. S SIVA KUMARI 3. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2188/2022 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 23.02.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22983 of 2021. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 23.02.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22983 of 2021 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 30.06.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 17 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2188/2022 30.06.2026 BSP/TPS