Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39938 (KAR)

VAJRAMUNI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/13295/2024 · 2026-09-11

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010682862024 NC: 2026:KHC:49924 CRL.P No. 13295 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13295 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. VAJRAMUNI S/O. LATE VENKATARAMA AGED 33 YEARS 2. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE VENKATARAMANA AGED 68 YEARS 3. MANJULA W/O. KUMARA AGED 27 YEARS 4. KUMARA S/O. MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED 35 YEARs ALL ARE RESIDING AT VADERAHALLI, TATAGUNI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KARUMBAIAH T.A..,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE RAMANAGARA TOWN RAMANAGARA DISTRICT BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010682862024 NC: 2026:KHC:49924 CRL.P No. 13295 of 2024 2. NETHRAVATHI W/O. VAJRAMUNI D/O. THIMMAIAH RESIDING AT VADERAHALLI, TATAGUNI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT NOW AT KADUVEKERE DODDI CHAKANAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAVEED.S, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.362/2019 PENDING BEFORE THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA REGISTERED BY RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAMANAGARA FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498A, 423, 504, 506, 114 AND 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER Though this matter is posted for the seventh time for compliance of office objections, there is no compliance of the same. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010682862024 NC: 2026:KHC:49924 CRL.P No. 13295 of 2024 prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/- SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PKS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30