AKASH HEMBRAM @ AKASH HEMBROM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1871/2026 · 2026-03-13
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3993 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3993 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6799
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1871 of 2026
Akash Hembram @ Akash Hembrom, aged about 26 years, S/o Dimbu Hembram @ Dimbu Hembrom, R/o- Village- Barjudih, P.S. & P.O- Kharsawan, District- Seraikella- Kharsawan, Jharkhand
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Ms. Juhi Kumari, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Saket Kumar, APP
---
02/13.03.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with S.T. Case No. 222 of 2025 arising out of Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, registered under Sections 309(5) of the BNS, 2023 and sections 25(1-B)(a), 26(1) and 35 of the Arms Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 20.07.2025 and charge has been framed on 03.02.2026. She further submits that there is an allegation of attempt to commit theft, but there is no recovery from the petitioner. She submits that the fire arm has been recovered from the co-accused person namely, Birendra Singh Kundiya.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
5.
Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner has confessed his guilt.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and the fact that there is allegation of attempt to commit lootpat and that the charge has already been framed coupled with the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.07.2025 having no criminal antecedent as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the
2026:JHHC:6799
2
petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella in connection with S.T. Case No. 222 of 2025 arising out of Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (iii) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:13.03.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:13.03.2026