Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39925 (CHH)

NARAYAN KUMAR MISHRA v. UMA MISHRA

SA/526/2018 · 2026-10-11

Smt Sushma Sawant

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010285702018 2026:CGHC:44106 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 526 of 2018 Narayan Kumar Mishra, S/o late Premnarayan Mishra, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Sevara, Tahsil Pendra, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Plaintiff) ... Appellant versus 1. Uma Mishra, Wd/o late Ramji Mishra, aged about 54 years, R/o Village Sevara, Tahsil Pendra, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Parsuram, S/o Mohan Kushwaha, aged about 62 years, 3. Mahendra Pratap Singh, S/o Mohan Kushwaha, aged about 54 years, Res. No.2 & 3 are R/o Rajnagar, Ward No.1, P.O. Rajnagar, Tahsil, Kotma, District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh. 4. Arvind Kumar, S/o Mahendra Pratap Kushwaha, aged about 30 years, R/o Jheemar Colliery, Tahsil Kotma, District Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh. 5. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : None present. For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Order On Board 12/10/2026 1. This appeal is directed against judgment & decree dated 18-6-2018 passed by the Additional District Judge, Pendra Road, District SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.10.13 11:28:02 +0530 2 Bilaspur in Civil Appeal No.38A/2017, arising out of judgment & decree dated 21-4-2017 passed by the Civil Judge Class-II, Marwahi, District Bilaspur in Civil Suit No.93A/2014. 2. When the matter is called for hearing in two rounds, none present for the appellant to prosecute the appeal. No representation is made. 3. In absence of representation on behalf of the appellant, the Court has no option except to dismiss the appeal. 4. The second appeal is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Soma