NAMAN CHOPRA AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/33256/2023 · 2026-03-24
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3992 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3992 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 176
NAMAN CHOPRA AND ANR STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present: Mr. Chahit Bansal, for the petitioners.
Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Jaideep Verma, for respondent No.2.
***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
As per status report
learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition being a premature petition.
2.
Dismissed as withdrawn. 24.03.2026 Gurpreet
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM Date of decision:
NAMAN CHOPRA AND ANR Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Chahit Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Shukla, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Jaideep Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) As per status report filed by the learned State counsel, the
learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition being a premature petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.
i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-33256-2023 Date of decision: 24.03.2026 ….Petitioners ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
filed by the learned State counsel, the
learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL)
JUDGE speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Petitioners s
filed by the learned State counsel, the
learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.03.25 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.