MD MUSTAQ ANSARI ALIAS MUSTAK ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./319/2026 · 2026-01-22
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3991 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3991 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:1752 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 319 of 2026
1. Md. Mustaq Ansari @ Mustak Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Gahim Ansari
2. Sharifuddin Ansari, aged about 50 years, son of Jamiyat Ansari
3. Amanat Ansari @ Amarat Ansari, aged about 26 years, son of Israil Ansari
4. Ilyas Ansari, aged about 29 years, son of Nazir Anari
5. Nawab Sharif @ Nawab Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Khalil Ansari All residents of Pandrabajram, Pandrabejra, Moraidih, P.S. Nirsa, District- Dhanbad ...... … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners
:Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P.
02/ 22.01.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Nirsa P.S. Case No. 217 of 2021, registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 379, 186, 413, 414, 420 of the I.P.C. and section 4/21 of MMDR Act and Rule 4/54 of JMCAR, Rules and 13 of JM (PITS) Rules, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dhanbad.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that earlier petitioners have moved in A.B.A. No. 6977/2025 which has been dismissed as withdrawn with observation that if the petitioners moved before the learned court for regular bail, the same will be decided in accordance with law without being prejudiced to that order.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that there is no change circumstances so far second anticipatory bail is concerned. He further submits that in the month of December, 2025 the said A.B.A has been dismissed as withdrawn and in the month of January, the present second anticipatory bail application has been filed.
( 2026:JHHC:1752 )
5.
Considering that on 09.12.2025 the aforesaid A.B.A has been dismissed as withdrawn and on 12.01.2026 the present second anticipatory bail application has been filed. The petitioners have not complied the observations made in the aforesaid A.B.A and in view of that the present second anticipatory bail is not maintainable and accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Pending I.A, is any, stands disposed of.
Dt.22.01.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-