Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3989 (CHH)

SMT. SEEMA AGRAWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1483/2025 · 2026-04-06

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:15909-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1483 of 2025 Smt. Seema Agrawal W/o Late Jogiram Agrawal Aged About 41 Years R/o Sonnarpara, Ratanpur, PS Ratanpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) (Correctly Mentioned Smt. Seema Agrawal) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through, Station House Officer, PS Ratanpur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Krishna Kumar @ Monu Soni S/o Manik Soni, Aged 37 Years, R/o Sonaarpara, Ratanpur, PS Ratanpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Soni Mishra, Advocate For Respondents No.1/State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, GA For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per, Ramesh Sinha, CJ. 07/04/2026 1. Heard Ms. Soni Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Government Advocate for the respondent No.1/State and Mr. Aman Tamboli, learned counsel for ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.04.07 17:24:00 +0530 2 / 2 Respondent No.2. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition with following prayer: It is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be kind enough to call for the case diary of Crime No.307/2020 from the Respondent no.1/ PS Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), registered for commission of offence u/s 294, 506 IPC, and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the charge-sheet filed on 10.07.2020 (Annexure P/1), the FIR dated 04.05.2020 (Annexure P/2) and consequential proceedings, in the interest of justice. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous as the matter has been settled in Lok Adalat vide order dated 14/03/2026 passed in Criminal Case No.805/2020. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents do not oppose the said submission. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as having become infructous. 6. Registry is directed to send copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ashu