Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 39863 (KAR)

SRI SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI v. SMT SOWBHAGYA @ BHAGYA N

CRL.P/6241/2020 · 2026-09-16

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010338452020 NC: 2026:KHC:50310 CRL.P No. 6241 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6241 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SRI SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI S/O SRI. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O BAGUDINAHALLI VILLAGE NARASIPURA POST SOMPURA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562111 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVAS A R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SOWBHAGYA @ BHAGYA N W/O SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO.149, BINNAMANGALA ARASHINEKUNTE POST NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123 2. SRI. PUNITH KUMAR S/O. SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR B V @ MANI AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS SINCE MINOR REP BY RESPONDENT NO.1 Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010338452020 NC: 2026:KHC:50310 CRL.P No. 6241 of 2020 R/AT NO.149, BINNAMANGALA ARASHINEKUNTE POST NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562123 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHANNEGOWDA K G, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 01.06.2018 ISSUING NOTICE AGAINST THE PETITIONER/RESPONDENT OF THE PETITION UNDER SECTION 12 R/W 17, 18, 20, 21 AND 22 OF THE PROTECTION WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-A FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties before the Lok-Adalath conducted before - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010338452020 NC: 2026:KHC:50310 CRL.P No. 6241 of 2020 the Trial Court. In view of the settlement arrived between the parties, the petition does not survive for adjudication. Hence, prays this Court to dismiss the petition as infrucutous. The said memo is taken on record. In view of the said memo, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN