Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010617012026 NC: 2026:KHC:48601 WP No. 28081 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.28081 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
MR. SUBBANNA SON OF LATE VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, DIED ON 31.07.2026, SINCE DEAD, REPRESENTED BY HIS LR'S
MR. CHANDRA S SON OF LATE SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT, 83, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD DINNEPALYA ROAD, KAGGALIPURA, KAGALIPURA, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA - 560 082 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N S SRIRAJ GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD,
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010617012026 NC: 2026:KHC:48601 WP No. 28081 of 2026
BENGALURU - 560 009 KARNATAKA
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISON KANDAYA BHAVAN, KG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 KARNATAKA
4.
THE TAHSILDHAR BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KANDAYA BHAVAN, KG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 KARNATAKA …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, OR ANY OTHER WRIT, QUASHING OF THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 24.03.2026 (ANNEXURE-E), ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4, IN RRT(U) CR/1058/25-26, WHEREIN THE PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR REGULARIZATION OF LANDS, IS REJECTED AND ETC
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010617012026 NC: 2026:KHC:48601 WP No. 28081 of 2026
2. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the endorsement dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure-E) passed by respondent No.4.
3. Taking into consideration that the petitioner is having an efficacious remedy by filing an appeal under the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, I am of the view that the petition cannot be accepted.
4. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Appellate Authority, the writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39