Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010576662026 NC: 2026:KHC:48642 WP NO.26560 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 26560 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
RAKSHITH J. GIRISH S/O M. VASU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.10/3, MYTHRI SADANA, M. STREET, MINARVA MILL BACKSIDE, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNA NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA.
2.
THE TAHASILDAR, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 24TH JULY, 2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND DISPOSSESS THE ENCROACHERS OF THE
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010576662026 NC: 2026:KHC:48642 WP NO.26560 OF 2026
PUBLIC ROAD IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents.
2. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 24th July, 2026 (Annexure-D) for removing the encroachment of road.
3. Heard Sri. Krishna Naik,
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Shamanth Naik, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the representation dated 24th July, 2020 (Annexure-D), it is
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010576662026 NC: 2026:KHC:48642 WP NO.26560 OF 2026
forthcoming that the dispute in this petition is civil in nature and same is required to adjudicated by the competent Civil Court. Therefore, I am of the view that, no interference be called for in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29