Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3983 (BOM)

ARJUN RAJESH JAISWAL AND ANR. v. RAJENDRA S/O ONKARSINGH TATU (THAKUR) AND OTHERS.

WP/6495/2026 · 2026-08-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 18 wp 6495-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6495 OF 2026 Arjun Rajesh Jaiswal And Anr. VERSUS Rajendra S/o Onkarsingh Tatu (thakur) And Others. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Abhijit Deshpande, Advocate for petitioner CORAM : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 24.08.2026 Heard. 2. After going through the record, it transpires that even though the order of the Appellate Court is under challenge, the said order is appealable under the provisions of Order XLIII Rule 1(r). 3. When confronted, Mr. Deshpande, learned Counsel in his usual fair-mindedness, concedes to the settled position and prays for conversion of the said writ petition into an appeal. 4. Permission is granted. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with permission to the learned Counsel for the petitioner to convert the same into an appeal against order, or such appeal as may be registered, and place the same before the appropriate bench. (NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.) Jayashree.. Signed by: Mrs. Jayashree Pethe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 25/08/2026 20:44:13