SAMMU S/O SHRI BANNO KHAN @ BANA KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/2964/2026 · 2026-02-24
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3982 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3982 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2964/2026 Sammu S/o Shri Banno Khan @ Bana Khan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kakrali, Police Station Sadar, District Alwar (Raj.) (Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A.- cum-P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 24/02/2026
1. Accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.595/2025 registered with the Police Station Sadar Alwar, District Alwar for offence under Sections 112(2), 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 61(2) and 221 of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.
2. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the present accused-petitioner. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 06.12.2025 and trial of the case is likely to take
[2026:RJ-JP:8382] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2964/2026] considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the
submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by
learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, so also the fact that the police after completion of investigation has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and he is in custody since 06.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /5