1 2026:CGHC:15906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1015 of 2023 Jatin Kumar Lakhmani S/o Shri Sushil Lakhmani, Aged About 29 Years R/o Tiwari Tola, Purani Basti, Akpangi, Basti, District Basti, Uttar Pradesh, India. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Telibandha, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Complainant Of The Crime No. - 0611 Of 2022, Under Sections- 376 (2) (N), 377 Of The Indian Penal Code, Police Station Telibandha, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Shubham Tripathi, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 07.04.2026 1. Heard, Mr. Aman Tamboli, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of respondent 2 No.1/State as also Mr. Shubham Tripathi, Advocate for the respondent No.2. 2. Petitioner has filed this petition with following reliefs: “A. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the First Information Report bearing no. 611 of 2022 registered by the Telibandha Police Station dated 20.9.2022 under Section 376(2)(n) & 377 of the Indian Penal Code, impugned Charge Sheet dated 17.11.2022, bearing its Challan (Charge-Sheet) No.- 608/2022, submitted for the offences made punishable under Sections -376(2)(n), 377 of the Indian Penal Code filed in connection to Crime No.-0611 of 2022, Under Sections-376 (2) (n), 377 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station-Telibandha, District-Raipur and Order dated 18/11/2022 Passed in Criminal Case No.- 16438/2022, CNR NO.-CGRP020455202022, (State vs. Jatin Kumar Lakhmani) passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur (contained herewith as ANNEXURE P/1(Colly) to this petition); B. Cost of the petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioner; C. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case the trial has been concluded and the petitioner has been acquitted from the charges. As such, the present petition has become infructuous. 3 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice J.